Commits
Marc Zyngier committed 755a8bf5579
arm/arm64: smccc-1.1: Handle function result as parameters If someone has the silly idea to write something along those lines: extern u64 foo(void); void bar(struct arm_smccc_res *res) { arm_smccc_1_1_smc(0xbad, foo(), res); } they are in for a surprise, as this gets compiled as: 0000000000000588 <bar>: 588: a9be7bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #-32]! 58c: 910003fd mov x29, sp 590: f9000bf3 str x19, [sp, #16] 594: aa0003f3 mov x19, x0 598: aa1e03e0 mov x0, x30 59c: 94000000 bl 0 <_mcount> 5a0: 94000000 bl 0 <foo> 5a4: aa0003e1 mov x1, x0 5a8: d4000003 smc #0x0 5ac: b4000073 cbz x19, 5b8 <bar+0x30> 5b0: a9000660 stp x0, x1, [x19] 5b4: a9010e62 stp x2, x3, [x19, #16] 5b8: f9400bf3 ldr x19, [sp, #16] 5bc: a8c27bfd ldp x29, x30, [sp], #32 5c0: d65f03c0 ret 5c4: d503201f nop The call to foo "overwrites" the x0 register for the return value, and we end up calling the wrong secure service. A solution is to evaluate all the parameters before assigning anything to specific registers, leading to the expected result: 0000000000000588 <bar>: 588: a9be7bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #-32]! 58c: 910003fd mov x29, sp 590: f9000bf3 str x19, [sp, #16] 594: aa0003f3 mov x19, x0 598: aa1e03e0 mov x0, x30 59c: 94000000 bl 0 <_mcount> 5a0: 94000000 bl 0 <foo> 5a4: aa0003e1 mov x1, x0 5a8: d28175a0 mov x0, #0xbad 5ac: d4000003 smc #0x0 5b0: b4000073 cbz x19, 5bc <bar+0x34> 5b4: a9000660 stp x0, x1, [x19] 5b8: a9010e62 stp x2, x3, [x19, #16] 5bc: f9400bf3 ldr x19, [sp, #16] 5c0: a8c27bfd ldp x29, x30, [sp], #32 5c4: d65f03c0 ret Reported-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>