linux-imx

Btrfs: incremental send, don't rename a directory too soon

There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a
directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames
only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number
that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay
the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a
directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it
has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that
was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the
receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old
name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a
"directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames
for this case too.

Steps to reproduce:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt

  $ mkdir /mnt/a
  $ mkdir /mnt/b
  $ mkdir /mnt/c
  $ touch /mnt/a/file

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1

  $ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x
  $ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y
  $ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2

  $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send
  $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2
  $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send
  $ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send
  ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty

A test case for xfstests follows soon.

Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>