Commits
Filipe Manana committed 85e0a0f21a1
Btrfs: remove unnecessary locking of cleaner_mutex to avoid deadlock After commmit e44163e17796 ("btrfs: explictly delete unused block groups in close_ctree and ro-remount"), added in the 4.3 merge window, we have calls to btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() while holding the cleaner_mutex. This can cause a deadlock with a concurrent block group relocation (when a filesystem balance or shrink operation is in progress for example) because btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() locks delete_unused_bgs_mutex and the relocation path locks first delete_unused_bgs_mutex and then it locks cleaner_mutex, resulting in a classic ABBA deadlock: CPU 0 CPU 1 lock fs_info->cleaner_mutex __btrfs_balance() || btrfs_shrink_device() lock fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex btrfs_relocate_chunk() btrfs_relocate_block_group() lock fs_info->cleaner_mutex btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() lock fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex Fix this by not taking the cleaner_mutex before calling btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() because it's no longer needed after commit 67c5e7d464bc ("Btrfs: fix race between balance and unused block group deletion"). The mutex fs_info->delete_unused_bgs_mutex, the spinlock fs_info->unused_bgs_lock and a block group's spinlock are enough to get correct serialization between tasks running relocation and unused block group deletion (as well as between multiple tasks concurrently calling btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()). This issue was discussed (in the mailing list) during the review of the patch titled "btrfs: explictly delete unused block groups in close_ctree and ro-remount" and it was agreed that acquiring the cleaner mutex had to be dropped after the patch titled "Btrfs: fix race between balance and unused block group deletion" got merged (both patches were submitted at about the same time, but one landed in kernel 4.2 and the other in the 4.3 merge window). Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>