Commits
Chris Wilson committed 88d3dfb6a69
drm/i915: Suspend submission tasklets around wedging
After staring hard at sequences like
[ 28.199013] systemd-1 2..s. 26062228us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=0 [0?], tail=1 [1?]
[ 28.199095] systemd-1 2..s. 26062229us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[1]: status=0x00000018:0x00000000, active=0x1
[ 28.199177] systemd-1 2..s. 26062230us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=0.1, seqno=3, prio=-1024
[ 28.199258] systemd-1 2..s. 26062231us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 completed ctx=0
[ 28.199340] gem_eio-829 1..s1 26066853us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]: ctx=1.1, seqno=1, prio=0
[ 28.199421] <idle>-0 2..s. 26066863us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=1 [1?], tail=2 [2?]
[ 28.199503] <idle>-0 2..s. 26066865us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[2]: status=0x00000001:0x00000000, active=0x1
[ 28.199585] gem_eio-829 1..s1 26067077us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[1]: ctx=3.1, seqno=2, prio=0
[ 28.199667] gem_eio-829 1..s1 26067078us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 in[0]: ctx=1.2, seqno=1, prio=0
[ 28.199749] <idle>-0 2..s. 26067084us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=2 [2?], tail=3 [3?]
[ 28.199830] <idle>-0 2..s. 26067085us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[3]: status=0x00008002:0x00000001, active=0x1
[ 28.199912] <idle>-0 2..s. 26067086us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=1.2, seqno=1, prio=0
[ 28.199994] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246084us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 cs-irq head=3 [3?], tail=4 [4?]
[ 28.200096] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246088us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 csb[4]: status=0x00000014:0x00000001, active=0x5
[ 28.200178] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246089us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 out[0]: ctx=0.0, seqno=0, prio=0
[ 28.200260] gem_eio-829 2..s. 28246127us : execlists_submission_tasklet: execlists_submission_tasklet:886 GEM_BUG_ON(buf[2 * head + 1] != port->context_id)
the conclusion is that the only place where the ports are reset to zero,
is from engine->cancel_requests called during i915_gem_set_wedged().
The race is horrible as it results from calling set-wedged on active HW
(the GPU reset failed) and as such we need to be careful as the HW state
changes beneath us. Fortunately, it's the same scary conditions as
affect normal reset, so we can reuse the same machinery to disable state
tracking as we clobber it.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104945
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Fixes: af7a8ffad9c5 ("drm/i915: Use rcu instead of stop_machine in set_wedged")
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302113324.23189-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 963ddd63c314e9b5d9cd999873d473a93aed5380)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>