linux-imx

ACPI: PM: s2idle: Execute LPS0 _DSM functions with suspended devices

According to Section 3.5 of the "Intel Low Power S0 Idle" document [1],
Function 5 of the LPS0 _DSM is expected to be invoked when the system
configuration matches the criteria for entering the target low-power
state of the platform.  In particular, this means that all devices
should be suspended and in low-power states already when that function
is invoked.

This is not the case currently, however, because Function 5 of the
LPS0 _DSM is invoked by it before the "noirq" phase of device suspend,
which means that some devices may not have been put into low-power
states yet at that point.  That is a consequence of the previous
design of the suspend-to-idle flow that allowed the "noirq" phase of
device suspend and the "noirq" phase of device resume to be carried
out for multiple times while "suspended" (if any spurious wakeup
events were detected) and the point of the LPS0 _DSM Function 5
invocation was chosen so as to call it (and LPS0 _DSM Function 6
analogously) once per suspend-resume cycle (regardless of how many
times the "noirq" phases of device suspend and resume were carried
out while "suspended").

Now that the suspend-to-idle flow has been redesigned to carry out
the "noirq" phases of device suspend and resume once in each cycle,
the code can be reordered to follow the specification that it is
based on more closely.

For this purpose, add ->prepare_late and ->restore_early platform
callbacks for suspend-to-idle, to be executed, respectively, after
the "noirq" phase of suspending devices and before the "noirq"
phase of resuming them and make ACPI use them for the invocation
of LPS0 _DSM functions as appropriate.

While at it, move the LPS0 entry requirements check to be made
before invoking Functions 3 and 5 of the LPS0 _DSM (also once
per cycle) as follows from the specification [1].

Link: https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/Intel_ACPI_Low_Power_S0_Idle.pdf # [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>