Commits
Pablo Neira Ayuso committed e53376bef2c
netfilter: nf_conntrack: don't release a conntrack with non-zero refcnt
With this patch, the conntrack refcount is initially set to zero and
it is bumped once it is added to any of the list, so we fulfill
Eric's golden rule which is that all released objects always have a
refcount that equals zero.
Andrey Vagin reports that nf_conntrack_free can't be called for a
conntrack with non-zero ref-counter, because it can race with
nf_conntrack_find_get().
A conntrack slab is created with SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU. Non-zero
ref-counter says that this conntrack is used. So when we release
a conntrack with non-zero counter, we break this assumption.
CPU1 CPU2
____nf_conntrack_find()
nf_ct_put()
destroy_conntrack()
...
init_conntrack
__nf_conntrack_alloc (set use = 1)
atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->use) (use = 2)
if (!l4proto->new(ct, skb, dataoff, timeouts))
nf_conntrack_free(ct); (use = 2 !!!)
...
__nf_conntrack_alloc (set use = 1)
if (!nf_ct_key_equal(h, tuple, zone))
nf_ct_put(ct); (use = 0)
destroy_conntrack()
/* continue to work with CT */
After applying the path "[PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU
race in nf_conntrack_find_get" another bug was triggered in
destroy_conntrack():
<4>[67096.759334] ------------[ cut here ]------------
<2>[67096.759353] kernel BUG at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:211!
...
<4>[67096.759837] Pid: 498649, comm: atdd veid: 666 Tainted: G C --------------- 2.6.32-042stab084.18 #1 042stab084_18 /DQ45CB
<4>[67096.759932] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa03d99ac>] [<ffffffffa03d99ac>] destroy_conntrack+0x15c/0x190 [nf_conntrack]
<4>[67096.760255] Call Trace:
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814844a7>] nf_conntrack_destroy+0x17/0x30
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffffa03d9bb5>] nf_conntrack_find_get+0x85/0x130 [nf_conntrack]
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffffa03d9fb2>] nf_conntrack_in+0x352/0xb60 [nf_conntrack]
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffffa048c771>] ipv4_conntrack_local+0x51/0x60 [nf_conntrack_ipv4]
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff81484419>] nf_iterate+0x69/0xb0
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814b5b00>] ? dst_output+0x0/0x20
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814845d4>] nf_hook_slow+0x74/0x110
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814b5b00>] ? dst_output+0x0/0x20
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814b66d5>] raw_sendmsg+0x775/0x910
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8104c5a8>] ? flush_tlb_others_ipi+0x128/0x130
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8100bc4e>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0xe/0x20
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8100bc4e>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0xe/0x20
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814c136a>] inet_sendmsg+0x4a/0xb0
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff81444e93>] ? sock_sendmsg+0x13/0x140
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff81444f97>] sock_sendmsg+0x117/0x140
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8102e299>] ? native_smp_send_reschedule+0x49/0x60
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff81519beb>] ? _spin_unlock_bh+0x1b/0x20
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8109d930>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814960f0>] ? do_ip_setsockopt+0x90/0xd80
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8100bc4e>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0xe/0x20
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8100bc4e>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0xe/0x20
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff814457c9>] sys_sendto+0x139/0x190
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff810efa77>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1d7/0x200
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff810ef7c5>] ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x265/0x290
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff81474daf>] compat_sys_socketcall+0x13f/0x210
<4>[67096.760255] [<ffffffff8104dea3>] ia32_sysret+0x0/0x5
I have reused the original title for the RFC patch that Andrey posted and
most of the original patch description.
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Vagin <avagin@parallels.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Reported-by: Andrew Vagin <avagin@parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Andrew Vagin <avagin@parallels.com>