Commits
Taehee Yoo committed fd3e71a9f71
netfilter: nf_conncount: use spin_lock_bh instead of spin_lock
conn_free() holds lock with spin_lock() and it is called by both
nf_conncount_lookup() and nf_conncount_gc_list(). nf_conncount_lookup()
is called from bottom-half context and nf_conncount_gc_list() from
process context. So that spin_lock() call is not safe. Hence
conn_free() should use spin_lock_bh() instead of spin_lock().
test commands:
%nft add table ip filter
%nft add chain ip filter input { type filter hook input priority 0\; }
%nft add rule filter input meter test { ip saddr ct count over 2 } \
counter
splat looks like:
[ 461.996507] ================================
[ 461.998999] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[ 461.998999] 4.19.0-rc6+ #22 Not tainted
[ 461.998999] --------------------------------
[ 461.998999] inconsistent {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} -> {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[ 461.998999] kworker/0:2/134 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
[ 461.998999] 00000000a71a559a (&(&list->list_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: conn_free+0x69/0x2b0 [nf_conncount]
[ 461.998999] {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[ 461.998999] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x70
[ 461.998999] nf_conncount_add+0x28a/0x520 [nf_conncount]
[ 461.998999] nft_connlimit_eval+0x401/0x580 [nft_connlimit]
[ 461.998999] nft_dynset_eval+0x32b/0x590 [nf_tables]
[ 461.998999] nft_do_chain+0x497/0x1430 [nf_tables]
[ 461.998999] nft_do_chain_ipv4+0x255/0x330 [nf_tables]
[ 461.998999] nf_hook_slow+0xb1/0x160
[ ... ]
[ 461.998999] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 461.998999] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 461.998999]
[ 461.998999] CPU0
[ 461.998999] ----
[ 461.998999] lock(&(&list->list_lock)->rlock);
[ 461.998999] <Interrupt>
[ 461.998999] lock(&(&list->list_lock)->rlock);
[ 461.998999]
[ 461.998999] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 461.998999]
[ ... ]
Fixes: 5c789e131cbb ("netfilter: nf_conncount: Add list lock and gc worker, and RCU for init tree search")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>