Commits
Dave Chinner committed 8af3dcd3c89
xfs: xlog_cil_force_lsn doesn't always wait correctly When running a tight mount/unmount loop on an older kernel, RedHat QE found that unmount would occasionally hang in xfs_buf_unpin_wait() on the superblock buffer. Tracing and other debug work by Eric Sandeen indicated that it was hanging on the writing of the superblock during unmount immediately after logging the superblock counters in a synchronous transaction. Further debug indicated that the synchronous transaction was not waiting for completion correctly, and we narrowed it down to xlog_cil_force_lsn() returning NULLCOMMITLSN and hence not pushing the transaction in the iclog buffer to disk correctly. While this unmount superblock write code is now very different in mainline kernels, the xlog_cil_force_lsn() code is identical, and it was bisected to the backport of commit f876e44 ("xfs: always do log forces via the workqueue"). This commit made the CIL push asynchronous for log forces and hence exposed a race condition that couldn't occur on a synchronous push. Essentially, the xlog_cil_force_lsn() relied implicitly on the fact that the sequence push would be complete by the time xlog_cil_push_now() returned, resulting in the context being pushed being in the committing list. When it was made asynchronous, it was recognised that there was a race condition in detecting whether an asynchronous push has started or not and code was added to handle it. Unfortunately, the fix was not quite right and left a race condition where it it would detect an empty CIL while a push was in progress before the context had been added to the committing list. This was incorrectly seen as a "nothing to do" condition and so would tell xfs_log_force_lsn() that there is nothing to wait for, and hence it would push the iclogbufs in memory. The fix is simple, but explaining the logic and the race condition is a lot more complex. The fix is to add the context to the committing list before we start emptying the CIL. This allows us to detect the difference between an empty "do nothing" push and a push that has not started by adding a discrete "emptying the CIL" state to avoid the transient, incorrect "empty" condition that the (unchanged) waiting code was seeing. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>