linux-phytec-fsl

timers: Clarify usleep_range() function comment

Update the usleep_range() function comment to make it clear that it can
only be used in non-atomic context.

Previously we claimed usleep_range() was a drop-in replacement for udelay()
where wakeup is flexible.  But that's only true in non-atomic contexts,
where it's possible to sleep instead of delay.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160531212302.28502.44995.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>