Commits
Josh Poimboeuf committed 471bd10f5e2
ftrace/x86: Implement HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_RET_ADDR_PTR Use the more reliable version of ftrace_graph_ret_addr() so we no longer have to worry about the unwinder getting out of sync with the function graph ret_stack index, which can happen if the unwinder skips any frames before calling ftrace_graph_ret_addr(). This fixes this issue (and several others like it): $ cat /proc/self/stack [<ffffffff810489a2>] save_stack_trace_tsk+0x22/0x40 [<ffffffff81311a89>] proc_pid_stack+0xb9/0x110 [<ffffffff813127c4>] proc_single_show+0x54/0x80 [<ffffffff812be088>] seq_read+0x108/0x3e0 [<ffffffff812923d7>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x140 [<ffffffff812929d9>] vfs_read+0x99/0x140 [<ffffffff81293f28>] SyS_read+0x58/0xc0 [<ffffffff818af97c>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xbd [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff $ echo function_graph > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/current_tracer $ cat /proc/self/stack [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27 [<ffffffff810394cc>] print_context_stack+0xfc/0x100 [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27 [<ffffffff8103891b>] dump_trace+0x12b/0x350 [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27 [<ffffffff810489a2>] save_stack_trace_tsk+0x22/0x40 [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27 [<ffffffff81311a89>] proc_pid_stack+0xb9/0x110 [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27 [<ffffffff813127c4>] proc_single_show+0x54/0x80 [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27 [<ffffffff812be088>] seq_read+0x108/0x3e0 [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27 [<ffffffff812923d7>] __vfs_read+0x37/0x140 [<ffffffff818b2428>] return_to_handler+0x0/0x27 [<ffffffff812929d9>] vfs_read+0x99/0x140 [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff Enabling function graph tracing causes the stack trace to change in two ways: First, the real call addresses are confusingly interspersed with 'return_to_handler' addresses. This issue will be fixed by the next patch. Second, the stack trace is offset by two frames, because the unwinder skipped the first two frames and got out of sync with the ret_stack index. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a6d623e36f8d08f9a17bd74d804d201177a23afd.1471607358.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>