Commits
Guoqing Jiang committed bb8bf15bd6f
md-cluster: fix deadlock issue when add disk to an recoverying array
Add a disk to an array which is performing recovery
is a little complicated, we need to do both reap the
sync thread and perform add disk for the case, then
it caused deadlock as follows.
linux44:~ # ps aux|grep md|grep D
root 1822 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? D 16:50 0:00 [md127_resync]
root 1848 0.0 0.0 19860 952 pts/0 D+ 16:50 0:00 mdadm --manage /dev/md127 --re-add /dev/vdb
linux44:~ # cat /proc/1848/stack
[<ffffffff8107afde>] kthread_stop+0x6e/0x120
[<ffffffffa051ddb0>] md_unregister_thread+0x40/0x80 [md_mod]
[<ffffffffa0526e45>] md_reap_sync_thread+0x15/0x150 [md_mod]
[<ffffffffa05271e0>] action_store+0x260/0x270 [md_mod]
[<ffffffffa05206b4>] md_attr_store+0xb4/0x100 [md_mod]
[<ffffffff81214a7e>] sysfs_write_file+0xbe/0x140
[<ffffffff811a6b98>] vfs_write+0xb8/0x1e0
[<ffffffff811a75b8>] SyS_write+0x48/0xa0
[<ffffffff8152a5c9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[<00007f068ea1ed30>] 0x7f068ea1ed30
linux44:~ # cat /proc/1822/stack
[<ffffffffa05251a6>] md_do_sync+0x846/0xf40 [md_mod]
[<ffffffffa052402d>] md_thread+0x16d/0x180 [md_mod]
[<ffffffff8107ad94>] kthread+0xb4/0xc0
[<ffffffff8152a518>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
Task1848 Task1822
md_attr_store (held reconfig_mutex by call mddev_lock())
action_store
md_reap_sync_thread
md_unregister_thread
kthread_stop md_wakeup_thread(mddev->thread);
wait_event(mddev->sb_wait, !test_bit(MD_CHANGE_PENDING))
md_check_recovery is triggered by wakeup mddev->thread,
but it can't clear MD_CHANGE_PENDING flag since it can't
get lock which was held by md_attr_store already.
To solve the deadlock problem, we move "->resync_finish()"
from md_do_sync to md_reap_sync_thread (after md_update_sb),
also MD_HELD_RESYNC_LOCK is introduced since it is possible
that node can't get resync lock in md_do_sync.
Then we do not need to wait for MD_CHANGE_PENDING is cleared
or not since metadata should be updated after md_update_sb,
so just call resync_finish if MD_HELD_RESYNC_LOCK is set.
We also unified the code after skip label, since set PENDING
for non-clustered case should be harmless.
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>